N. Vylegzhanin
To Win
T. Lamasine
To Win
Vit Kopriva vs Tristan Lamasine Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L W W L
Form
W W W W W L L L W WHead To Head: Kopriva 1 - 1 Lamasine
They have played 5 sets in total, with Kopriva winning 3 and Lamasine winning 2. The last match between Kopriva and Lamasine was at the Quimper Challenger, 28-01-2020, Second, I.hard with Vit Kopriva getting the victory 6-4 7-6(6).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vit Kopriva | 1 |
| Tristan Lamasine | 1 |
Quimper Challenger(28-01-2020)
6
4
7
6
| Kopriva | Stats | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| 70% (19-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (13-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 95 | Ranking | 650 |
| 95 | Highest Rank | 181 |
| 27 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 6 |
| 60% (387-261) | Career Total W/L | 54% (440-368) |
| $510,660 | Career Prize Money | $160,780 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
- / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kartal VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Vit Kopriva
Player
Tristan Lamasine
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-0 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Vit Kopriva
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 22 | Games Won | 25 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:47:10 | Average Match Time | 1:47:10 |
| 57% (99/175) | 1st Serve % | 58% (80/137) |
| 66% (65/99) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (55/80) |
| 43% (33/76) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (29/57) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (8/15) |
| 39% (53/137) | Return Points Win % | 44% (77/175) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vit Kopriva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Vit Kopriva
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Valentin Royer
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
48 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
111
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Vit Kopriva
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Borna Gojo
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Luciano Darderi
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Calvin Hemery
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tristan Lamasine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Alex Marti Pujolras
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
45%
(
31 of
69)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
55 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Rottoli
Player
Tristan Lamasine
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
13 of
22)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
52
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Perot
Player
Tristan Lamasine
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
10 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Tristan Lamasine
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Leo Raquillet
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Maxence Bertimon
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Hamish Stewart
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
7
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 6-7(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Loann Massard
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Kenny de Schepper
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (387/261) | Win/Loss | 54% (440/368) |
| 57% (856/657) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (985/878) |
| 53% (7353/6547) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (9088/8666) |
| 60% (87/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (88/64) |
| 61% (273/175) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (178/165) |
| 47% (23/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (170/136) |
| 57% (4/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1619 | Aces Total | 2120 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1669 | Total Double Faults | 1635 |
| 1:39:40 | Average Match Time | 1:16:18 |
| 433.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 520.29 |
| 60% (25267/42046) | 1st Serve % | 64% (28336/44418) |
| 65% (16542/25267) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (19201/28336) |
| 49% (8290/16778) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8102/16082) |
| 47% (2297/4878) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1738/4134) |
| 43% (18512/42738) | Return Points Win % | 39% (17275/44019) |
| 43% (10/13) | Slam W/L | 38% (9/15) |
| 50% (7/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (22/15) | Main Tour W/L | 39% (13/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (157/118) | Challenger W/L | 51% (245/233) |
| 64% (190/107) | Futures W/L | 64% (173/99) |
| 60% (378/635) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (426/789) |
| 75% (6/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (3/6) |
| 53% (79/149) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (145/259) |
| 61% (130/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (138/253) |
| 88% (350/308) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (420/358) |
| 12% (350/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (420/62) |
| 27% (297/79) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (388/80) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
